Wednesday, February 07, 2007

A Kafir terrorist in a Believer's nightmare?

Wednesday, February 7, 2007
A Kafir terrorist in a Believer's nightmare?
Dear everyone participating in these blog discussions about Islam. I feel Muneerka is in a strange stage of being confused about his dream state and reality. He says in a comment in his own blog MISCONCEPTIONS - WHAT TO KNOW ABOUT ISLAM - FOR THOSE INTERESTED ONLY! [Tues, Feb 6, 2:47:40 AM], "BUT my conscience is against replying to Venugopal - after his comment to blow up 1000 Muslims in a mosque so they would be happy to be Shaheeds!" Except for two or three exchanges of e-mail with him, where he unilaterally ceased to reply to me fearing that someone is out to transfer viruses into his computer, I have always been responding to him only on NDTV blogs. Fortunately I have a record of all my blogs and comments. Nowhere have I talked about blowing up 1000 Muslims in a mosque or wherever. Then from where did he get the quotation? Have I become a part of his nightmares? I did mention that he could be suffering from paranoia. Seems I’ve been proved right.
Anyway, I wish to assure him, if I could, that I see Muslims just as I see others, as fellow-human beings. My problem is with this tendency of Muslim writers to pass of faith as fact, which, as a self-appointed writer myself, I feel I have to question. That’s all my blogs reflect. I am no terrorist.
8:34:21 PM
Posted By Venu Gopal Comments (0) Uncategorized
Comments
jj Wednesday, February 7, 2007 8:23:00 PM
swami vivekananda describes fear as a sin.if what venugopal says is true, then i would request all muslim friends who visit this forum to give up their fear psychosis.please do not be afraid to face the truth and face facts.it is a fact that osama bin laden is a devout sunni muslim who is wagain jihad in the name of allah.now when such a point is put forth you immediately react hysterically

jj Wednesday, February 7, 2007 8:26:37 PM
for example when i make a statement "osama bin laden is a sunni muslim is killing kafirs"none of the muslim friends reply precisely and relevantly to the point, they immedaitely go back to the quran ... quote so and so verse from so and so surah ...quote things from the life of prophet etc.......but at the end of the day, the question still remains unanswered, it would be much better, if this quoting frenzy stopped and precise and accurate and rational replies are given.
muneerudeen Saturday, February 10, 2007 12:13:28 AM
JJ-I stand by hwat I mentioned and nobody is runnign away. I have that blog of Anil Joshi-in which he and other planned to blow up a mosque and kill 1000 muslims. I can repost it if necessary-BUT like I said-the next bomb that goes off in Malegaon or any Gaon-then that blog is going to go to the CBI ? And let them find out from NDTV if such ablog was posted or not ?
muneerudeen Saturday, February 10, 2007 12:35:58 AM
Sorry that was on Garry Kisten's blog on 25 December 2006 at 3.21.35PM Bajrangi & Terrorist in which Venugopal replied january 11 2007 1.31.51 PM.See even this blog is titled Kafir & terrorist-similar title. So whose having NIGHTMARES NOW !!
K.Venugopal Monday, February 12, 2007 9:12:06 PM
Dear Muneerka, Talking about Malegaon, can you please tell me why Muslims put bomb in a mosque?

The Ramjanmabhoomi movement - India's golden run


Wednesday, February 7, 2007
The Ramjanmabhoomi movement - India's golden run
Dear Jumbo Jumbo,
This is comment to your blog "To Indian Muslims, some fundamental questions" as I could not paste it in the comment slot there.
Just look at the history of India for the last 1000 years. India was going through its dark night. The first light of dawn came with Swami Vivekananda, though the background was laid by the work of innumerable savants and valiant men, from Guru Nanak, Shivaji, Chaitania Mahaprabhu to Swami Dayanand Saraswati even during the dark period. Then events started to pick up with first the call to end untouchability, formation of the RSS, Mahatma Gandhi’s freedom movement and all that. We got our independence, alas a truncated one, but a long Congress rule only saw slow progress. Then came the movement that finally awoke the Hindus - the Ramjanmabhoomi movement. With the placing of the idol at the spot believed by all Hindus, even anti-RSS ones, as the birth place of Lord Ram, India started the upward swing. Vajpayee consolidated it during his rule, but he had his limitations. The construction of a grand temple at Ayodhya and the formal consecration of the idol there will coincide with the take off of India into the stratospheric sphere of success. Therefore December 6, 1992 is a golden day in the history of India. Not a dark day, but the brightest one. Yet I too feel it is a sad day because there was no intention of destroying the so-called mosque but the plan was to shift it. Egged on by the leftists and Congress, Muslims failed to see the Hindu standpoint and the whole thing ended in unintended destruction of the mosque.
1:12:14 AM
Posted By Venu Gopal Comments (5) Uncategorized
Comments
muneerudeen Wednesday, February 7, 2007 1:12:55 AM
Mr Moderator @ NDTV !YOU ARE A ?.You have parsed my links whereas you have kept the wrong links intact ! YOU asked for trouble. Now i am going to flood your blogs with links to all the world's islamic sites. Let me see you block me out ! SHAME on NDTV.Why dont you rename it RSSTV OR BJPTV
jumbo_jumbo Wednesday, February 7, 2007 1:38:53 AM
muneer please dont get angry. ndtv is a neither right nor leftthis is just a forum
jumbo_jumbo Wednesday, February 7, 2007 1:43:00 AM
venu,i feel that the unintended demolition did a damage to the reputation of rss as a disciplined organization
jumbo_jumbo Wednesday, February 7, 2007 1:47:04 AM
venu,i feel that the unintended demolition did a damage to the reputation of rss as a disciplined organization
jj Wednesday, February 7, 2007 2:05:20 AM
at the same we also have to question "why not even a whisper was raised when hundreds of hindu temples were demolished in the kashmir valley"

ajmal rashid Thursday, February 8, 2007 1:26:14 PM
WHEN THE DIGGING OF THE PLACE STARTED,THEN INSTEAD OF THE TEMPLE,ANOTHER MOSQUE WAS FOUND THERE.SO THE STOPPED THE PROCESS AT THAT TIME.AND STILL IT IS STOPPED.AND U BLOODY PEOPLE ,OBVIOUSLY U WILL ENJOY IT.SAALO,WAHAAN MANDIR THA BHI YA NAHI,YE TO PROVE KAR HI NAHI PAYE AUR CHALE CRITICS BAN NE
DALIT Thursday, February 8, 2007 1:31:17 PM
FIRST THING,HINDUISM IS NOT A RELIGION.THEY ARE MAKING THE PEOPLES FOOL.AND THE RAM ABOUT WHOM THEY ARE TALKING WAS AN IMPOTENT(READ V.T RAJSHEKHAR'S BOOK RIDDLES ON RAM AND KRISHNA.)AND THEY RESPECT RAMA ONLY BECAUSE DASHRATH GAVE HIS WIFE TO THE UPPER CASTE BRAHMANS,AND RAM WAS THUS BORN(READ THE MONTHLY DALIT VOICE BY V.T.RAJSHEKHAR)

Saturday, February 03, 2007

Is he who is an enemy to others also an enemy to Allah?


Saturday, February 3, 2007
Is he who is an enemy to others also an enemy to Allah?
I am quoting herebelow verse 98 of Chapter 2 of the Quran, which Swami Dayananda Saraswati took up for comment in his book Light of Truth.

Whoso is an enemy to Allah or his angels or to Gabriel or to Michael, shall have Allah for his enemy, for verily Allah is an enemy to infidels.

To which Swamiji commented as below:

Where does this host of partners come from, if, as the Muslims say, Allah is one without a partner? Is he who is an enemy to others also an enemy to Allah? This can never be true, since God is an enemy to none.

Has the Swamiji quoted and commented out of context? Since it is the basic premise of the Quran that Allah has no partners, why has Allah mentioned the Angels, Gabriel and Michael, as on par with Him in this verse? Who is the enemy Allah has who would threaten all of them together? Satan?
11:38:14 PM
Posted By Venu Gopal Comments (0) Uncategorized

Comments
muneerudeen Saturday, February 3, 2007 11:34:48 PM
Firstly Verse 98 is continuation of Verse 97 in the context of revealing the Quran through the Angel Gibreel to the Prophet.And Verse 101-103 continues about the enemy at that time was -the ones to whom had come an Apostle and they threw away thier book- and folowed the evil ones who taugh magic and sowed discord !
sunYaMan Saturday, February 3, 2007 11:36:26 PM
This is just stupid blog!!This is like trying to read english without knowing ABCD.I never expected from VENU
muneerudeen Saturday, February 3, 2007 11:43:16 PM
In such a context -whoever threw away the guide book before and now prevented the Prophet or the Angels from performiing the orders of ALLAH-surely they are enemies of ALLAH ! If Swami Dayanandji OR Venuji were present at that situation - this statement would apply to them as well ! (PLEASE-PLEASE_ DO NOT READ THE QUR'AN OUT OF CONTEXT !)
muneerudeen Saturday, February 3, 2007 11:46:17 PM
The Qur'an is NOT a dictionary to pick iut words or meaning or phrases or paragraphs ! It has to be read and understood in context with its revealation- and IF ANY later Verses were revealed subsequently in time (NOT LATER CHAPTERS) - or again if any direction is given in the practices of the SUNNAh of the prophet of ISLAM - ! This is just like the quickfix "Triple Talaq" judgement of a Mumbai COurt !
muneerudeen Saturday, February 3, 2007 11:48:59 PM
Islam does not allow 'Triple Talaq" in ONE GO- OR one sitting ! Sharia Laws dont allow that- BUT the black sheep and Politicians of all colors get the unlawful Fatwas- to widen their political base ! This is NOT ISLAM - This is hinduised Islam !To suit the politicians -Nothing more !
muneerudeen Saturday, February 3, 2007 11:52:42 PM
Now Venu- Your name is linked with Swami Dayanandji-in this blog ! Does that maje you a partner of Swamiji-OR does it even raise you to his status ? NO.
muneerudeen Sunday, February 4, 2007 12:16:48 AM
Similarly -The Angels were carrying the message of Allah to HIS Prophet and if anyone sowed discord or created problems for this Command-THEN they are the enemies of ALLAH. That is what the Chapter 2 Section 12 Verses 97 to 103 says !
muneerudeen Sunday, February 4, 2007 12:20:56 AM
Venu !Please ,Please DO NOT PICK CHERRIES IN THE QUR"AN ! It contains Advice-Admonishment LAW-Punishment-Faith-Disbeleif-Angels-Devil-Sun-Moon-Right-Wrong-Male-Female-everything. So you have to harvest ALL the Cherries and then SORT them out ! I think you got my point =??
infidel Sunday, February 4, 2007 12:37:15 AM
Muneer, You must agree that god is the creator and we all are his creation.God is omniscient and all powerful, do you really think he has an enimy, specially such tiny creatures like we humans?Why god has to consider his own creations as his enemy at first place? The most merciful, the god should forgive everybody, even if one refuses to accept god's word? Otherwise he is not most merciful and hence not god. Otherwise what is the difference between we human and the god?
muneerudeen Sunday, February 4, 2007 1:07:48 AM
That is the beuauty of the Creator ! He waits for YOU to ask for forgivness earnestly -And he forgives him who asks for MERCY !EveryMercy Petition with ALLAH is granted - so long as it is earnest and from the heart ! HE knows what is in our hearts !Thats the Prasadam from Our Lord !Not just Puja Paat !
muneerudeen Sunday, February 4, 2007 1:10:12 AM
Again you misunderstand ! The enemy in that verse are those who blasphemed against King Solomon-threw away the covenents-perverse-evil people-friends of the Devil !They would again be enemies of ALLAH if they prevented the Angels from conveying HIS WORDS to the Prophet . As for Mercy-you dont get it unless you REPENT and ASK for it !ALLAH is only waiting !
infidel Sunday, February 4, 2007 1:22:01 AM
You didn't understand muneer.How can anybody prevent angels to convey allah's word to muhammad? Do we tiny humans have that power to go against allah will and his angel's wish? think upon it. If god is waiting for mercy pretition, I will ask for mercy as an infidel, will he grant? You actually can not say about god's decision, he knows the best, not you, right muneer?
infidel Sunday, February 4, 2007 1:24:55 AM
A human can have enemy but god cannot have an enemy? Even if he has one, that can not be tiny humans like us.Do you think me as your enemy and that of muhammad's and hence of allah's as I am questioning THE WORD OF ALLAH and not submitting myself to islam?PS: Please answer, don't avoid. It has become your practise to avoid question asked to you and move on another topic.
muneerudeen Sunday, February 4, 2007 2:05:04 AM
Infi !You are forgetting that the receipent of the Qur'an is a human-Prophet Muhammed pbuh. (Oh your theory is different -I forgot).If YOU honestly with clean mind & heart ask for MERCY- Allah WILL grant IT ! It is HIS OWN WORD and HE -YOUR CREATOR_ WILL NOT FAIL YOU ! TRY it !
infidel Sunday, February 4, 2007 2:08:19 AM
So muneer, I can ask mercy from god with pure heart as an infidel till death and he will forgive, right. Fine with me.How enemy of muhammad became enemy of god? You are not answering the question that why god has to have an enemy? only muhammad had enemies, not god.
muneerudeen Sunday, February 4, 2007 2:08:41 AM
No-You are questioning-Debating-talking-judging- thats not an enemy ! Its those with hate-fear-sin-envy-lie-and above all treacherous people -who are enemies. A person questioning the faith can NEVER be an enemy- ! Even Venu inspite of his utterences of blowing up a mosque-is not my enemy-TILL HE COMMITS THAT DASTARDLY ACT !
muneerudeen Sunday, February 4, 2007 2:11:13 AM
Infi- I never avoid any question- BUT you have no right to question what is between me and MY LORD ! I dont pray-fast-read quran or do charity for you to see ! So dont expect me to reply to those questions ! OK.? Anything else I will answer !
muneerudeen Sunday, February 4, 2007 3:38:52 AM
Infi !I saved every time i POSTED A COMMENT AND IT GOT THROWN OUT. nOW SOMEHOW ALL your COMMENTS ARE IN oRDER & MINE ARE NOT !@i SUSPECT YOU ARE WITH THEM ?
infidel Sunday, February 4, 2007 7:03:40 AM
muneer, keep on suspecting untill you prove. Like I am one of the cartoon mahers, I am with NDTV, I am both infidel and Infidel2 and so on. I can't help you in that. Sorry
infidel Sunday, February 4, 2007 7:47:20 AM
Actually muneer you avoided many questions. For example 1)In your opinion who is right - Muhammad or Drs Naik/Morres regarding quranic stages of embryology? muhammad said alaqa is 40-60 days and mudghah is 80-120 days but Dr Naik/Moore say alaqa is 23-24 days and mudghah is 27-28 days. presuming that muhammad being your prophet, he cannot be wrong does this implies that Dr naik/moore are wrong? Please answer this time.
infidel Sunday, February 4, 2007 7:52:08 AM
2) Do you see a 7-week fetus and stage 23 fetus in fig providedd in previous blogs, as clots?Its not a sc. question but see and tell one. I hope you know how a clot looks like. Now tell me "are they really look like clot or more like human baby (with hands, legs, head all in developing state)?Now keep your words that you never avoid any question and answer these 2 questions first.then more to come

K.Venugopal Tuesday, February 6, 2007 8:56:44 AM
Dear Muneerka,You say “the enemy was the ones to whom had come an Apostle and they threw away their book and followed the evil ones who taught magic and sowed discord” Is this not tantamount saying that those who did not follow a particular book were seen as enemy and their path characterized as erroneous and discordant? The same intolerance for which Islam is even now being charged.When you talk of preventing the Prophet or the Angels from performing the orders of Allah, what is implied is that such orders should never be questioned and everyone should submit right away, otherwise Allah will act on charges of obstruction. You talk about reading the Quran not according to order of the chapters but according to the order of the dates of revelation of the texts. Does this mean that the chapters in the Quran were arranged arbitrarily?No doubt the Quran contains a lot of things and no doubt the Quran is a great book or even the greatest according to its followers. But does that invalidate other scriptures and don’t others have the right to consider their own scriptures as the best? In Hindu culture this is allowed and therefore all scriptures ever written are extant because Hinduism is underscored by the principle of live and let live. In Islamic culture, not even the books said to have been sent by Allah earlier are extant (for instance, not the Bible, which Islam believes is a corrupted version, but the Injil, the original Bible.)When you say Infi has no right to question what is between you and your Lord, I say that is the whole issue. Mohammad sought to question what was between the idol worshippers and the idols. Mohammad did not give them any rights, but you ask for rights in the name of Islam.

infidel Tuesday, February 6, 2007 10:26:29 AM
Very well said venu.In islamic terminology, a person is called innocent till he is not asked to convert. Once he is asked to convert (read asked to come to the right path, shown divine book, shown the light of the true religion etc)he is no more innocent. He has been shown the truth and has to accept it else you know what. And "No compulsion in religion" and Islam means "peace and tolerance". You got my point.Whenever you see some muslim saying "Islam forbids murder of innocent" just remember the islamic meaning of innocent.
muneerudeen Saturday, February 10, 2007 1:14:33 AM
Venu & Infi !You guys cannot be "Innocent" when you are asking questions fowarded by your swami ! So can I address you (all) as infidels or apostates or enemis of Islam ! BUT go on let your 160 discourses come up-I will answer whatever I can. And those I dont know-I will NOT even attempt to answer till I study that ! OK ? Like in Arabic Bahar means Sea & Ardh means earth !-They dont mean land per se!

Tuesday, January 30, 2007

Questioning the very first words of Allah.


Tuesday, January 30, 2007
Questioning the very first words of Allah.
Swami Dayanand Saraswati, founder of Arya Samaj and author of ‘Light of Truth’, is a famous historical personage. In Light of Truth, written over 100 years ago, he has in the 14th chapter examined Islam through the words of the Quran. He starts with the very first words of the Quran:

1. In the name of Allah, the Compassionate, the Merciful.

Commentary:

The Muslims claim that this Quran is the Word of God, but it appears from the above passage that the author of this book was some person other than God, since had it been God himself, He would not have said: “(I begin this book) in the name of God etc.” He would have, instead, said: “I write this book for the instruction of mankind.” If it be said that by beginning His book in this fashion He means to teach men as to what they should say when about to do a thing, it cannot be true, since some men will do even sinful deeds in the name of God and thereby bring disgrace on Him. If Allah be merciful, why has He sanctioned that men should inflict great suffering on other creatures by killing them for their food? Are not these other animals innocent? Are they not His creatures? He should have also advised men to begin only good deeds in His name and not evil ones. Thus the passage (under discussion) is quite ambiguous. Should even such sinful acts as theft, adultery, untruthfulness in speech, be begun in God’s name? Very likely it is on account of this ambiguity that the Muslim butchers etc, mutter “In the name of Allah, the compassionate, the most merciful” at the moment of cutting the throats of cows and other animals.”

It is clear then that the Muslims do begin even evil deeds in the name of God. The Muslim God can never be called Merciful, because He shows no mercy towards those animals (whose slaughter He sanctions). If the Muslims do not know the true meaning of this passage, its revelation is of no use to mankind. But if the Muslims interpret it differently, we should like to know what its plain meaning is.

There are over 160 such commentaries on verses and assumptions in the Quran by the Swamiji. While I do not intend to quote all of Swamiji’s commentaries, I would, off and on, quote further commentaries, if I am permitted by my fellow-bloggers to do so. I must also add that Swamiji has thoroughly ‘critiqued’ Hinduism and Christianity too in Light of Truth, not on a mission of fault finding, but simply as an expression of his point of view with malice to none. Swamiji, as is well-known, was a champion of the Vedas and interpreted it with uncompromising scholarship.
7:27:04 PM
Posted By Venu Gopal Comments (0) Uncategorized

Comments
VINOD Tuesday, January 30, 2007 7:30:42 PM
HiToday's world is in crisis because of books and interpretations about God. Best thing is to stop interpretations since all languages have limitations and days going by also changes the understanding of words of speech.Tiday in the name of God and belief's men are killing each other.vinod
Infidel Tuesday, January 30, 2007 7:41:22 PM
Excellent post, Venu. I appreciate.I quote from your post:"The Muslim God can never be called Merciful, because He shows no mercy towards those animals".Why only animals? Allah doesn't show any mercy towards kafirs/nonmuslims/idolators (Convert or die), a little mercy towards people of book (giving one more option of dimmitude).And followers of muhammad are slaughtering each other from just after his death to till date, in the name of allah, the most merciful and most companssonate, the all knowing only true god.
RADHAKRISHNAN.C Tuesday, January 30, 2007 9:22:13 PM
Good response from infidel to your post Venu.Keep it up
muneerudeen Friday, February 2, 2007 12:37:00 AM
VENU ! What stupidity YOU and your Swami utter. The first words of the Quran revealed by the Arch Angel Gabriel to Prophet Mohammed was " IQRA !- Read ! Bismi Rabbik ! In the name of your creator ! Unless you understand the Qur'ans revealation and compilation- You cannot understand Venu Swamiji !
muneerudeen Friday, February 2, 2007 12:40:32 AM
As for the only Chapter which does not start "In the name of ALLAH" -its called "Tauba" same in Hindi- Repentence ! All other subjects come under the instructions of ALLAH to man ! Only Tauba -Seking Forfiveness is left for Man. And HE forgives-He is merciful to forgive you for your sins-BIG and small BUT only if you SEEK forgiveness !
muneerudeen Friday, February 2, 2007 12:44:13 AM
Killing among humans is by Politicians -statesmen- for GREED - Money. Even the first killing of Prophet Adam's' son Habal of his own brother Cabal was human jealousy !And GOD through a crow- showed him how to bury the body and be merciful even after that crime! That is the mercy Allah talks about !
muneerudeen Friday, February 2, 2007 12:45:27 AM
Kiling among humans is by Politcians -statesmen- for GREED - Money. Even the first killing of Prophet Adam's' son Habal of his own brother Cabal was human jealousy !And GOD through a crow- showed him how to bury the body and be merciful even after that crime! That is the mercy Allah talks about !
muneerudeen Friday, February 2, 2007 12:46:03 AM
Kiling among humans is by Politc ians -statesmen- for GREED - Money. Even the first killing of Propet Adam's' son Habal of his own brother Cabal was human jealousy !And GOD through a crow- showed him how to bury the body and be merciful even after that crime! That is the mercy Allah talks about !
muneerudeen Friday, February 2, 2007 12:53:06 AM
Venuji- I would like to hear more about Swamiji deciphering the words of ALLAH - And I am sure I can correct your MISCONCEPTIONS ABOUT ISLAM ! So go ahead create a blog everyday and I shall reply -in plain english -So all can read ! OK ???
muneerudeen Friday, February 2, 2007 12:57:07 AM
Seek forgiveness and it shall be accepted by ALLAH-that is the admonishment for all-even Muslims,.Just prayer or Charity OR HAjj OR Fasting will not complete ISLAM unless YOU Accept ALLAH and seek forgiveness from HIM !If a Muslim does all the above BUT is too pompous to seek forgiveness from Allah- he will surely go to HELL !
muneerudeen Friday, February 2, 2007 12:59:48 AM
Infi infi Infi ! I did not think your arguments were so shallow ! Mercy is for man not animals. It is man who kills NOT ALLAH ! -either for food-or for sport-or sheer vanity ! He tramples ants out of sheer power. If it were the work of ALLAH then surely-Allah can make all the elephants crush Humans to pulp ! THINK !
muneerudeen Friday, February 2, 2007 1:10:07 AM
Killing of Animals for food- by cutting the throat-though it looks barbaric- is to safeguard the health of the HUMAN-which is the best of GOD's Ccreation! By the removal of blood by cutting the jugular vein- the meat is hygenic without blood in it and fit to eat !No other reason-Is it NOT cruelty- to beat an animal to pull a man or a cart ??Why dont you condemn that ! !

Infidel Friday, February 2, 2007 6:04:05 PM
Muneer, what you are trying to say contain a vaste topic of debate. It cannot be done in a blog or two. You know that presently I am having debate with Human & Learner, the core issue is quran so far. We will be moving to islam, muhammad, allah in due course of time, if that debate continues. I cannot debate or comment at all the places at the same time, I have some limitaions too, specially availability of time. So have some patience and we will discuss this soon.
K.Venugopal Friday, February 2, 2007 9:28:52 PM
Muneerka, The Swamiji was considering the Quran. The first words of the Quran is what I have quoted. The words you have quoted may have been the first words of Allah to Mohammad, but they are certainly not the first or any of the words of the Quran. Please clarify.
K.Venugopal Friday, February 2, 2007 9:34:14 PM
Vinod, There's point in what you say. Nevertheless, language is such that it inspires us to express and enjoy expressions.
K.Venugopal Friday, February 2, 2007 9:39:01 PM
Dear Muneerka, Please tell me about the only chapter which does not start with the words "In the name of ALLAH" and why.
K.Venugopal Friday, February 2, 2007 10:00:53 PM
Dear Muneerka, You said "Even the first killing of Prophet Adam's son Habal of his own brother Cabal was human jealousy! And GOD through a crow - showed him how to bury the body and be merciful even after that crime! That is the mercy Allah talks about!" If Allah had inculcated mercy in Cabal, Habal would not have been murdered. Then He shows the murderer how to bury the body. Was it mercy too late?
K.Venugopal Friday, February 2, 2007 10:02:21 PM
Dear Muneerka, I would not find any need to seek forgiveness from God, who would in any case not be disturbed by even my most heinous crime. I would in such a situation allow the consequences to overtake me and not be a coward and escape the consequences via God.
K.Venugopal Friday, February 2, 2007 10:19:51 PM
Dear Muneerka, Why do you say, "Mercy is for man not animals"? Allah is ready to show mercy to man if he begs for forgiveness. Does He not show mercy to animals because they do not know how to beg for mercy?Jains and Brahmins teach not to kill animals for food, whichever way. Why don't you accept that such teachings are more humane than the Quranic permission to kill animals for food?

Monday, January 29, 2007

Is everyone a Muslim by birth?


Monday, January 29, 2007
Is everyone a Muslim by birth?
There was a blog on Monday, January 22, 2007 titled Rachel Noor-The Reversion Story, posted By Mohammed Irshad Hussain at 7:39:17 PM, to which I commented:
“This is a touching story and hope she would be happy in her new religion. But why has she called it a reversion when it was a conversion?”
Irshad4u in turn commented, “Think true think right It is not conversion it is reversion because Islam is God's religion as everyone is Muslim by birth.”
I think it sounds funny, though I am sure Irshad4u did not crack a joke and he has sincerely made a statement which is believes is true. It sounds funny because it is quite of a piece with Muslims’ claim that Islam existed even before Mohammad!
Dear Muneerka,
I did not question Irshad4u right to hold any religious believes he wants. As a Hindu, it is not in our blood to do that. But as a Hindu it is in our blood to question all assumptions as we are bound by no slavish decree.

Dear Infidel,
There is nothing to fear. Our basic reality is consciousness/awareness/wakefulness. Because of the palpable nature (on/off nature) of consciousness, if we are in awareness at the moment of death, that moment would be as wondrous as any we can experience in our awakened state. If we are unconscious, it does not anyway matter. Consciousness never suffers, only our lack of awareness causes suffering. When Krishna said in the Geeta what a person thinks at the moment of death that he becomes, there is quite a lesson there. At crucial moments we are not likely to think right (like Arjuna was not able to in the battlefield) unless we are seeped in the culture of consciousness. The technique of awakening to our full consciousness is meditation (the turning within). When we are seeped in the culture of meditation, then nothing can catch us off-guard, not even death. In any case, death brings new life, not eternal roast. But Paradise . . . ah! with Gardens of Eternity beneath which rivers flow where the late slave will be adorned with bracelets of gold, wearing green garments of fine silk and heavy brocade; reclining on a beautiful couch in a beautiful mansion, fed with fruits and drink of wine pure and holy and served by youths of perpetual freshness. How good the recompense!. . . Let’s ask Muneerudeen bhai to put in a good word for us, just in case . . .

8:43:28 PM
Posted By Venu Gopal Comments (8) Uncategorized
Comments
muneerudeen Monday, January 29, 2007 9:51:27 PM
VenujiYou have your beleifs and we have ours ! WE AGREED TO DISAGREE-REMEMBER ? iRSHAD 4 u COMMENTED ON OUR BELEIF-iIts upto you to take it or reject it. Every person has been given the power of understanding and what religion he chooses finally will matter !
dalit_voice Monday, January 29, 2007 10:03:01 PM
Mr Muneer i completely agree with you.Just because people are leaving hinduism for a better religion does not mean you will bring a legislation to curb it.There has to be freedom of following any faith.
WILLY JOWER Monday, January 29, 2007 10:51:41 PM
THIS MAY BE NICE JOKE "EVERYBODY A MUSLIM BY BIRTH". DO EMAIL THIS JOKE TO WORLD SO THAT PEOPLE LAUGH A LOT. IF SOMEBODY GETTING SERIOUS JUST THINK WHAT THE GREAT TERRORIST FACTORIES ARE MAKING, ARE THEY NOT MUSLIMS ??
Badmash Monday, January 29, 2007 10:59:49 PM
Terrorist+Muslim= Devil, Yes who ever born with devils quality they are muslim. so not everyone is Muslim by birth.
Accha Admi Monday, January 29, 2007 11:16:47 PM
Hey why do hindu woman worship P enis?That because they constantly need one LOL
lotus Monday, January 29, 2007 11:26:56 PM
Accha Admi, Your comment shows your frustration, when you cant answer logically.There can be many similar acidic, irrelevant comments on you also. So stick to the topic.
amardeep Monday, January 29, 2007 11:43:32 PM
hey Lotus, why pinpoint accha Admi only read other blogs also, they are equally bad as they are also illogical.
K.Venugopal Tuesday, January 30, 2007 12:07:28 AM
Dear Muneerka, Please see above.

Upper_caste Tuesday, January 30, 2007 12:18:38 AM
hey Readers see this comment from Dalit_voice"Mr Muneer i completely agree with you.Just because people are leaving hinduism for a better religion does not mean you will bring a legislation to curb it.There has to be freedom of following any faith. "Kill these untouchables
perfektm Tuesday, January 30, 2007 12:59:11 AM
you need to get your circumcision done, without that you are not muslim according to holy koran.... so everyone is born as a hindu :p
Infidel Tuesday, January 30, 2007 1:51:22 AM
Muslims need circumcision and shahada and chirtians need baptism. So one can not be muslim or christian by birth. May be hindu, Jain etc.
Infidel Tuesday, January 30, 2007 2:13:18 AM
I can't recall now, but there is something like, allah asks before birth to follow islam, he takes oath from person to born etc. May be Irshad or Muneer can help?
muneerudeen Tuesday, January 30, 2007 2:14:43 AM
Being born a Muslim-means being born pure- sinless- Then you grow you commit sins-repent-again commit sins-again repent-again commit sins-again repent ! "Summa aamanu Summa Kafaroo-Summa Aaamanu Summa Kafaroo-Summazdadu Kufran......
muneerudeen Tuesday, January 30, 2007 2:17:42 AM
When you die a Muslim-with Eiman-you are sinless and go to Heaven.But if you die without Eiman-as a follower or as a Non Muslim-you face the Lord's questions and his Judgement-in which we have no say !He forgives-those HE wishes and condemns those who follow the Shaitan !
muneerudeen Tuesday, January 30, 2007 2:26:38 AM
Circumsission -Shahada and Baptism are for this WORLD's firststeps in life-YOUR ABC's .Then you progress to degrees of Faith and become a PHd OR a success in life ! Thats the true Goal of Islam. A Phd for the next life while doing your thesis and working for it in this life !
Infidel Tuesday, January 30, 2007 7:46:28 AM
Muneer, do you mean to say that muslim means sinless? Please explain what is islamic definition of sin, eimaan, faith.If a nonmuslim (by birth)lives his whole life with great humanity, love and care for others, never hurt a person, always helpful to others, dies as non muslim, will he be considered as sinner by allah just because he was not muslim in his earthly life?Will a muslim be not considered as sinner even if he murdered, looted, raped and did all wrong things in his life, but dies as muslim?
RUZAN_SHAH Tuesday, January 30, 2007 8:06:58 AM
VenuYes Islam was there before Mohammed & it sounds funny to you & you dont understand this simple fact because you are on the lower strata of spiritual ladder.Islam talks from Adam to Mohammed, its loud & clear in Quran that Allah sent thou messenger to all the races,all over on all the time.Adam was first prophet & Mohammed was last prophet & Islam is refinement of all the divine decrees.You need to be a muslim to understand certain trueth, you cant understand higher echelon when you are stranded in 84 lakhs feras.84 lakh fere fir ke achha bhala aadmi ghan chakkar ho jayega bhaiya...lolAnyway your claim is funny though...lolActually its not in your blood to question rationale if so why you never question sexual exploitation of Devdasi ?You never question stupid caste system by Manu ?You never question absurd & illogical puranas ?whats the logic of linga pooja ?Stop your non-senseYou people never think with open heart & mind thats why you vandalised & banned Mira Naiyyer's water just because it exposed the cruelty against helpless widows in the banks of your most holy siteWatch that movie its really shocking & it is nominated for Oscar award from Canada.Shame on you & your stupidity.
muneerudeen Tuesday, January 30, 2007 1:21:16 PM
Infi !Surely - A person like you - who has questioned the faith so deeply -and not accepted Islam -Even if you have been good ,human everything- Still will go to HELL ! Others who are unaware of Islam -may not - It is ALLAH's WILL AND HE ALONE CAN JUDGE !We are only Humans-his creation !

K.Venugopal Tuesday, January 30, 2007 1:46:13 PM
Dear Ruzan, Hinduism has, each generation, the option to look anew its heritage, chuck off useless package, cherish the valuable and continue in its journey to the divine. Islam, with no option, is stuck with middle-age baggage and seeks to curtail the journey to the divine due to its inability to move on with the dead-weight of its baggage. Islam has only one chance of survival that that is through a demographic victory. The increasing number of loyal foot soldiers (off unrestricted breeding) may put it in a position to vanquish militarily all kafirs. But alas, the compulsions of living in a modern world (not the creation of Mohammad), might not ever give Muslims a demographic superiority.
K.Venugopal Tuesday, January 30, 2007 2:06:00 PM
Dear Muneerka, Whatever in truth Islam is, your interpretation as evidenced in your comment above, reveals that yours is a zombie like existence as far as spiritualism goes. But you might not be worried about it. Convinced of being Allah's loyal foot solider, the very faith would keep you living in fool's paradise quite comfortably.

Basdmash Tuesday, January 30, 2007 5:30:03 PM
Very True- even its loud and clear in Nursery Rhymes about "Adams and Eva"(Tarzan & Zen) i didn't know if they were also Terrorist..lol
Infidel Tuesday, January 30, 2007 6:59:03 PM
Venu, you can see the compulsion in muneer's reply. He wrote:"A person like you - who has QUESTIONED the faith so deeply -and NOT ACCEPTED ISLAM -Even if you have been GOOD HUMAN everything- Still will go to HELL"So one has to accept islam since one has questioned whether quran is from god or muhammad. Even after proving that quran is from muhammad, I have to accept islam in any case, in order to save myself from allah's hell. How pathetic and how fear mongering?And you are discussing spiritualism with him? What was your word, oh yea, "ZOMBIE", doesn't it say all?
Infidel Tuesday, January 30, 2007 7:04:12 PM
AND venu, don't forget"NO COMPULSION IN RELIGION".You will see many times this "bits and pieces" and "out of context" verse to convince that islam is peace and tolerance.You have read analysis of this verse in detail, right. Get enlightened, venu, islam is the only true religion without any compulsion. Allah is all wise and he alone can judge (actually he had judged already before you and me were born, LOL).
K.Venugopal Tuesday, January 30, 2007 7:27:38 PM
Dear Infidel, I've just posted a piece of commentary by Swami Dayanand Saraswati, legendary founder of the Arya Samaj, on Quran. His critique on Islam (as well as Hinduism, Christianity etc) would be an eye-opener if you have not already read Light of Truth. Worth locating the book and pouring through it.
Infidel Tuesday, January 30, 2007 7:39:23 PM
And Venu, we should thank kafir's technology, the INTERNET, which just saved us from being beheaded. Do you think I would have been able to comment here today, when debate ended yesterday if it was not on internet?Anyway, be fearful of hellfire.LOL
Infidel Tuesday, January 30, 2007 7:52:24 PM
Thanks, venu.By now, you would have understood what "fallacy of circular reasoning" is.Who says muhammad is allah's prophet - its quran.Who wrote quran - muhammad.So who is self proclaimed prophet of islam - muhammad.And islam was on this earth from adam onwards.LOLwhat is the proof that adam was first prophet of islam - quran.and "You need to be a muslim to understand certain trueth" means submit your logic and rational thinking and your intellegancy (if you have being a non muslim), then only you will see the truth.
K.Venugopal Tuesday, January 30, 2007 8:41:23 PM
Dear Infidel, Please read my comment to you posted in my blog above.

RADHAKRISHNAN.C Tuesday, January 30, 2007 9:33:35 PM
Dear Mr.Venugopal,you are wasting time and energy trying to convince these people who in the first place dont want to understand what freedon of religion is.They are so much obligated to their faith they dont want to hear others talk anything but their view point.Only had they known what religious freedom is they would atleast make an attempt to hear you.Under the circumstances all you say will be falling on deaf hears.think u know the three monkeys.It suits these people better
affu Tuesday, January 30, 2007 9:42:28 PM
Hey Ruzan , i really appreciate your comment, keep itupNo matter how much u try to explain them with all possible rationale reasoning these people are determined not to leave the path of irrational thinkig.
Infidel Tuesday, January 30, 2007 10:06:03 PM
Great one, Venu. I don't want such a paradise, which is full of sex (72 vergins and eternal errection)and vine and gold but no divinity, no eternal peace, no moksha, no godThis is a dream shown by muhammad to his companions, (who only dreamed of such things in their earthly life), to sacrifies in the name of allah, to fulfill his own wishes. Hoories, vine, gold, silk, a kind of imaginary bribe to the blind followers to die for muhammad.
Krishna_bhumi Tuesday, January 30, 2007 10:18:31 PM
Mr RADHAKRISHNAN.C you are right!We enjoy the freedom of religion, Our religion does not intefere in having sex with our mothers & sisters, killing innocent, taking part in dirty politics etc.we separeate religion from our day to day activities
affu Tuesday, January 30, 2007 10:24:56 PM
Akhir kitna samjha jayega aap logo ko?Any d ick wil understand by reading various comments these people have made...
Infidel Tuesday, January 30, 2007 10:28:06 PM
Venu, we are irrational and they are rational, LOL.Then why can't they answer our questions rationally? Why always end up with AD HOMINEM, RED HERRING etc?
taklu Tuesday, January 30, 2007 10:29:06 PM
Abay infidelpagal bhi apnay ko hosiar samajhta hai like you think.
Infidel Tuesday, January 30, 2007 10:54:40 PM
Venu, you can see the WISDOM revealed by ZOMBIES. Need any more proofs? LOL
Badmash Tuesday, January 30, 2007 11:27:08 PM
Lol Lol lolllll Infidel, good sense of humor, u just hit the bulls eyes ;), Thats wot m wondering why venu is still replyin to'em, see how nasty is Muslim i found one arab mms a muslim guy wrote quraan on his wife A$$ lolllll was funy sory it was . best place to preach loll
Sita Tuesday, January 30, 2007 11:31:13 PM
The best god for woman to pray is P enis Bhagwan!! Dont you think Badmash. LOL LOL LOLI lik the shape of the Lingus, imagine how big must be the hole.LOL LOl LOL @##@
Infidel Wednesday, January 31, 2007 8:17:09 PM
this is an example of "tu quoque". From wikipedia:"Tu quoque (Latin for "You, too" or "You, also") is an argument that implies that a certain position is false and/or should be disregarded because its proponent fails to consistently act in accordance with that position; it attempts show that a criticism or objection applies equally to the person making it. It can be considered an ad hominem argument, since it focuses on the opposite party itself, rather than its positions.For instance, "Reverend Bob claims that theft is wrong, but how can theft be wrong if Bob himself admits he stole objects when he was a child?"If there are mistakes in hinduism or any other religion, how does that make islam perfect. Just because muhammad said so in quran (not god, for sure).Only islam claims to be directly from god, the only true religion.
manMan Wednesday, January 31, 2007 10:31:07 PM
Mr Infidel iam not supporting any side but why you always against muslims?Cant you see the language of both sides.I wonder if you are paid to blog against muslim etc
Infidel Thursday, February 1, 2007 12:09:19 PM
I am not against muslims. I am against the claim that only one religion is true and others are fake, untill proven.Keep your wonder with you, I can't help you in that, sorry.
muneerudeen Friday, February 2, 2007 1:23:17 AM
Infi !Do I see two sides of you ! Your comments here are different from those in the debates ! Well we all have our bad moods I guess !Venuji I am waiting for more discourses from Swami Dayanand ji ! As for the foul mouthed-no one can clean it up for them !
muneerudeen Friday, February 2, 2007 1:26:15 AM
Infi !So little you have all understood ISLAM. No one said ALL religions are fake-except ISLAM. Look at it this way- Islam is Windows VISTA and that doesnt make Win XP or WIN98 or WIN 95 fake ! It is onle NEW ! IMPROVED ! ALL religions are from GOD-your Eashwar-MY ALLAH ! BUT ISLAM is the LASTEST ! SO UPDATE yourselves !
muneerudeen Friday, February 2, 2007 1:28:29 AM
Infi "Tu quoque" is too much for me.But in simple english- reverend Bob's story.When Rev Bob was a kid he did not understand theft.Now he understands it and if he commits theft-then he is sinning ! Thats the concept of ISLAM- Learn the truth and practice it !Same with everyday life. You know you cannot work with WIN 95- then Upgrade to Win Vista ! Easier than "tu quo que" Right folks !
muneerudeen Friday, February 2, 2007 1:42:19 AM
In fact even today I think HINDU SWAMIS- PRAY in the NUDE -Just the way they were created -in front of their creator ! So when they go there-why should they be ASHAMED ! We ALL dont go to HEAVEN dressed in ARMANI suits -Just remember that ! Its only the wickedness in MAN's mind that makes us clothe ourselves on earth !
muneerudeen Friday, February 2, 2007 1:53:39 AM
Infi - you said above-No compulsion in Religion- Allah knows even before we were born !LOL!Let me rephrase this ! Baghwan knows what you do- who your parents are-when you were conceived-everything- and he made you be born in a Hindu family as a human -not a dog or cat or crow- Right ? So whats the problem in just substituting your Baghwan for OUR ALLAH ???and then read it !
muneerudeen Friday, February 2, 2007 1:54:27 AM
Infi !Again -on your bribes of 72 Virgins and thrones of Silk and Brocade- Why -cant you wait for your rewards.Oh those are evreyday rewards you get for a few bucks from Prostitiutes -Right ? So whats so great about wine and silk. Its forbidden now BUT rewarded if you want to splurge after you are victorious !You dont spray champagne till you WIN a race !Why ?
muneerudeen Friday, February 2, 2007 1:54:46 AM
Venuji ! My Zombie Life as a foot soldier of ALLAH is a thousand times better than Spiritually cleansing oneself by having a dip in the polluted Ganga-OR pouring milk over a phallus-or giving food to GODS-that dont eat them-OR adorn them with jewels-or sell LADDUS as GODS prasadam ! And the sightseeing of females at templs! Entertaining stuff really ! TRUE better than Zombie Life in HELL !
muneerudeen Friday, February 2, 2007 1:59:36 AM
Those are similitudes NOT bribes ! BUT do you think your CREATOR cannot provide you ALL the promised things - IF you wanted it- AS a reward for your sacraficing those earthly pleasures now ? And you wont look at it the same way in Heaven - simply because the sense of being in the LAWFUL presence of your LORD EASHWAR - OUR ALLAH !
muneerudeen Friday, February 2, 2007 2:04:17 AM
Venu- In your reply to RUZAN- you say that Only MUSLIMS are multiplying through unrestricted breeding and the demographics are differnt in modern times ! TRUE_ because Muslims DONT abort their female foetesus (NOT MURDER?)They dont stab you at the BACK and fight with bare hands-against the mightiest military demographics of Modern warfare _ AND YET WIN !Thats what ALLAH's Foot soldiers do !
muneerudeen Friday, February 2, 2007 2:25:50 AM
I guess this is getting too much with comments- So let me give a chance to others to answer and I'll come back and correct your misconceptions in a few days ! TATA !

ruizvan Friday, February 2, 2007 9:57:42 PM
Very very well said Muneer bhai,After reading your comments i am reminded of an Ayah in the Quran were Allah says in Surah nahl:125. Invite (mankind, O Muhammad ) to the Way of your Lord (i.e. Islâm) with wisdom (i.e. with the Divine Inspiration and the Qur'ân) and fair preaching, and argue with them in a way that is better. Truly, your Lord knows best who has gone astray from His Path, and He is the Best Aware of those who are guided. And also the next ayah:126. And if you punish (your enemy, O you believers in the Oneness of Allâh), then punish them with the like of that with which you were afflicted. But if you endure patiently, verily, it is better for As-Sâbirin (the patient ones, etc.) but still the non-believers wrongly state that "Allah has asked muslims to kill all the non muslims".
K.Venugopal Saturday, February 3, 2007 11:10:08 AM
Dear Muneerka, You said, "No one said ALL religions are fake except ISLAM." If you can prove that Islam and its interpreters say that other religions are also true just like Islam, then our debate ends. Because this is the position I am trying to convince you and this is the Hindu position. You also said, "ALL religions are from GOD-your Eashwar-MY ALLAH!" This too I agree. But when you say, "ISLAM is the LASTEST!" I disagree. For something that is 1,400 years old can hardly be the latest, considering that we've had the Sikh religion, Bhahai faith, the Sai phenomenon, to mention just a few, all after Mohammad. Worse still, Islam holds that it is the LAST word of God. This is the hollowest claim ever made in the history of religions. Islam, having restricted God in space by saying that He is separate from his creation, also restricts Him in time by saying that He stopped talking in the middle ages!
K.Venugopal Saturday, February 3, 2007 11:17:58 AM
Dear Muneerka, Your example of Win 95 and Win Vista would see Bill Gates upgrade from Vista without a 1,400 years and still continuing hiatus. Has Allah lost even Bill Gate's creativity in upgradation?
K.Venugopal Saturday, February 3, 2007 3:17:05 PM
Dear Muneerka, I am unable to follow the context in which you talk about Hindu Swamis praying in the nude. Please elaborate.
K.Venugopal Saturday, February 3, 2007 3:18:01 PM
Dear Muneerka, You ask, "So what's the problem in just substituting your Baghwan for OUR ALLAH?" It’s Hindus who say "Allah, Ishwar tere naam". The idea is not substitution but inter-changeability because the meaning of both the words are not different. Would you as a Muslim agree to this?
K.Venugopal Saturday, February 3, 2007 3:48:19 PM
Dear Muneerka, Promises of virgins, thrones, silk and brocades are from the Quran. If you think they are "everyday rewards you get for a few bucks from prostitutes", are you saying the Quran is promising you prostitutes in Paradise?
K.Venugopal Saturday, February 3, 2007 4:54:32 PM
Dear Muneerka, About zombie life as foot-soldiers, dip in polluted Ganga . . . well, it takes everything to make up life. Let us live and learn and let our conclusions only be a take-off for newer learnings. Let us not say that knowledge ends and the last word has been arrived at, whether in the Vedas or the Quran.
K.Venugopal Saturday, February 3, 2007 5:39:22 PM
Dear Muneerka, You say that our sense of being in the LAWFUL presence of "your LORD ESHWAR - OUR ALLAH would transform matters in Heaven. No doubt. But does that mean that Allah is not present on earth or that his presence is unlawful? I am sure not, but the way you've put things, it sounds that way.
infidel Sunday, February 4, 2007 12:23:38 AM
Munner, are you trying to deviate from islam? Isn't islam is the only true religion, allah is only true god and quran is allah's word? If islam is not the only true religion then other religions are also true. That means god of other religion is also true and other religious scriptures also true as they guide us to god. Please clarify.
infidel Sunday, February 4, 2007 12:31:07 AM
Great one, Venu. Could not say better than that.You can see, what is the effect of sticking to 7th century idiology. Since quran is the last word of allah, nothing can go after that. Nothing is even permissible to think beyond quran, because allah is all knowing and he put everything in quran for all man kind, all times and all places. So if you are trying to find/research/eveolve other than quran said, actually you are going against allah's words,'coz that can not be reformed.That is the reason that all islamic countries are so poor and backward (except oil-rich countries). Perfect example was afganistan under atliban rule.Just think, if whole world turn into ummah, ie everybody is muslim, there will be no advancement, nosc. discoveries (you actually don't need any, all miracles are in quran), no medical research, etc. In other world, in 21st century, we will be vertually living in 7th century barbarism.
K.Venugopal Sunday, February 4, 2007 9:19:25 AM
Dear Infidel, It can be safely said that the whole issue between Islam and other religions is that Islam says that Mohammad brought the last word of Allah. I would be comfortable with every other word in the Quran because, being of a philosophic bend of mind, I would be able to put it in proper perspective. The problem is with one single word in the Quran. I am not getting into the etymology of the word but in English translation the word 'seal' has been used. A particular Quranic verse says that Mohammad is the seal of prophets. Even among the Muslims, the word seal is understood as meaning, say, 'excellent', i.e., Mohammad is the most excellent of the prophets or even, the greatest of the prophets. But somewhere along the line, or at the beginning of the line, the word seal was understood as 'the last', as in 'sealed and delivered' - no more changes are possible. According to me, it could mean that Mohammad was the last in a series of ‘disciplic’ successions, from Adam, Abraham, Moses, Jesus to Mohammad. This is probable when we consider that the all knowing Quran has not mentioned Hinduism – Rama, Krishna, Shiva, Devi or any of a whole host of them, including Mahavir and Buddha. . It has not touched even on the Vedas, though now-a-days Muslims claim that the Vedas have spoken of Mohammad! Speaking of successions and the last of it, Satya Sai Baba has said that there would be one more avatar of him to come, meaning that the series which began with Shirdi Baba and continued with Satya Sai Baba would end with Prem Baba. I do not think Satya Sai Baba said anywhere that after Prem Baba, the deluge! The same goes for, say, the Swami Narayan sect, which has a disciplic succession. So in that way, Mohammad may be last. But to say that Mohammad got the last word of God and we have now only to wait for the deluge (the last judgement in this case) is the reason why Islam, as is expounded, sticks out like a sore thumb in the world of religion.

Dear Ruzan, Saudi King refused to go to Gandhi Samadhi, you refuse to sing Vande Mataram.

Dear Ruzan, Saudi King refused to go to Gandhi Samadhi, you refuse to sing Vande Mataram.
Dear Ruzaan Shah,
About Mahatma Gandhi - what respect did the King of Saudi Arabia, the custodian of the Holy Mosques and exemplar of Islam, show when he came to India? He became the only head of state not to go to the Gandhi Samadhi because he said that it is against Islam. You follow your Islamic King by not singing Vande Mataram. And still have the gumption to doubt the patriotism of RSS, who remember Mahatma Gandhi in their daily prayers.
You don’t have to give 500 years to the RSS to reduce the Muslims to micro-minority. With the Sunni leaders declaring Shias as non-Muslims, Islam is on the brink of being reduced to Sunnism.
The widespread understanding is that Muslims burnt the bogey in Godhra and invited all the riots that took place in Gujarat. Let’s wait for the Shah Commission report.

I am happy that you are proud of India’s secular fabric. Has any Muslim country got such a secular fabric? Does Islam itself envision such a secular fabric? Islam believes that it alone is the true religion and all others are false. Please understand that India is secular because Hinduism is secular – it accepts plurality of approaches to and expressions of God.
Ruzan, are you on to name dropping? If you know Modi, I know the Sultan of Oman!
12:10:17 AM
Posted By Venu Gopal Comments (0) Uncategorized

amardeep_malaysia Tuesday, January 30, 2007 12:02:31 AM
hey Venu,Before commenting do your homework first.Dont forget to mention Malaysia, Indonesia, Maldives etc.
K.Venugopal Tuesday, January 30, 2007 12:14:15 AM
Dear Amardeep, Malaysia has loaded everything in favour of whom they call Bhumiputras - the local Muslims. Indonesia was for a long time under military rule. Maladives? Too tiny to matter.

arvind36 Tuesday, January 30, 2007 12:22:35 AM
Agreed fully with you Mr Venu.Responsibility to maintain cordial relations lies on all communities concerned. Any group, community looking down upon other is bound to provoke a reaction. Hitler viewed his own race as the 'most superior'and killed millions.This invited strongest reactions from others.So, any religion/community which tries to look down upon others is spoiling the cordiality of society.

amardeep_malaysia Tuesday, January 30, 2007 12:28:10 AM
Hey venu,I have been living in Malaysia from last 30 years and have never felt that iam an outsider or an Hindu. Its a much better democracy than India, i call india a fake democracy.We Hindus allways give examples of countries like pakistan when refering while forgetting Good points of Islam.Come out from that shell which prohibits rational thinking!!
jj Tuesday, January 30, 2007 12:50:02 AM
this is a wonderful article by venu which shows the hypocrisy of the so called goal of islamic universal brotherhood
K.Venugopal Tuesday, January 30, 2007 1:17:16 AM
Dear Amardeep, I was born and brought up in Malaysia and did much of my schooling there. How come you are not feeling that you are a Hindu? Have they castrated you? Please do not insult India by calling her democracy fake. Democracy in India means not just electoral democracy. The very psyche of India is democratic thanks to the vision of Hinduism.

muneerudeen Tuesday, January 30, 2007 2:00:35 AM
RuzanjiTHERSS pray daily for their sin of killing the Mahatma ! And they blame the Saudi King for not bowing to their VICTIM ! They sell their land to go to Saudi to make money ! Thats the attachment to the Mathrubhumi !
muneerudeen Tuesday, January 30, 2007 2:03:46 AM
Where is hypocrisy here.THERSS killed Mahatmaji AND now they are singing his praises !
muneerudeen Tuesday, January 30, 2007 2:08:28 AM
As for widespread beleifs of the SHAH Commission report or the Babri Masji report- they willa ccept it if it favors them ! Even Advanji said it about the Sri Krishna report !
muneerudeen Tuesday, January 30, 2007 2:11:59 AM
Hindusim is so brioad minded that they demolish Babri Masjid-break shops that sell valentine day cards- BUT if muslims do something to protect themselves-they are labelled anti national !The Old proverb-You cannot straighten a dogs tail with a pipe !
jay Tuesday, January 30, 2007 3:47:13 AM
You have mu$lim n@row minded man im sure u been educated in backword fanatic muslim madera$$$.
jay Tuesday, January 30, 2007 3:47:25 AM
dont bring rss yoy are just atacking just they r hindu.this is why muslims are carvers for the country they live in
ruzan_shah Tuesday, January 30, 2007 7:56:33 AM
Here you go crazy again Venuas usualWe are debating patriotism & you deviated & brough-in saudi king.....lolCant you stay straight ?Oh ya your pantheism & janm janmantar crap makes you do that all the time.Anyway we are on the straight path & we talk straight & direct.No escapism of avatars...huhOk I dont care about any king & he is not Indian so leave him alone. You cant enforce your whims on others.RSS was banned by Government of India twice for anti-social activities & they literally did shastang dandvat to Indira's feet for amnesty as their founder savarkar did to queen of England and if you still think Indian government was so stupid that they banned your patriots khakhi idiots then you are the biggest idiot.About name dropping you better go & ask your God father Modi that who I am, dont go into that dude I told you I know him more than you.Why do you want to wait for your puppet shah, Banerjee report is there but you dont want to accept your heinous crimes.Your god father Modi was refused by UK & USA, no entry for criminals.Check Amnesty InternationalHuman Rights WatchBritish Parliamentary Delegation ReportIf you can read go & check all those reports by non-muslims on Gujarat genocide. You are pathological liar.If you & your modi are innocent why you guys banned Final Solution & Parzaniawhy ?Go and ask Vinod Sharma & Raju Dholakia a Hindu Gujarati.Mail me your adress & I will sent you DVD of Final Solution by Vinod Sharma, your evil deeds are exposed by these Hindus who are real god fearing Hindus & not those criminals & killers who are self-proclaimed psuedo Hindus, people like you are actually shame on Hinduism.
muneerudeen Tuesday, January 30, 2007 1:09:26 PM
JAY !I have never been to a Madrssa and at 50+ I am still learning -because guys like you attack Islam for nothing ! So please be frank and DONT be a Hypocrite !THERSS killd Mahatmaji and now they are praying for him ! JOKE OR EYEWASH !
muneerudeen Tuesday, January 30, 2007 1:11:42 PM
RuzanjiDONT ! Please dont mail any reply to Anil Joshi-Prudent ,Venuji etc- UNLESS you have a strong security system on your computer and have Firewall everything. I replied and my computer got hacked- BUT there is nothing in my Data which they want !So be careful when replying to EMails !
K.Venugopal Tuesday, January 30, 2007 2:10:56 PM
Dear Muneerka, I think you are getting paranoid. Don't fear. I won’t harm you (or your computer) physically. But if you are harmed psychologically that's not my fault. Belief is not enough. It is still dependence. You have to be spiritual - become independent. Then you will never be hurt psychologically.
K.Venugopal Tuesday, January 30, 2007 2:43:09 PM
Dear Ruzan Shah, Comments in my blog.

Wednesday, January 24, 2007

Dear Radhakrishnan, Let's see in a new light


Wednesday, January 24, 2007
Dear Radhakrishnan, Let's see in a new light
Dear Radhakrishnanji, I agree with what you have written about our reckless politicians. If you wish to, we could explore the possibilities of solving the problem or seeing the whole issue from a fresh angle. This would require a couple of blogs and comments exchanges. If you are game, let’s begin for what it is worth.

To solve a problem we need to know what the problem is and where the problem is, only then can our solutions hit the mark. While we can easily list the problems we need to solve to make our lives better, we normally make a mistake in assuming that the problems are ‘out there’. According to me, all problems have their genesis in the restless minds of individuals. This restlessness is something that has grown upon us due to the culture of ‘lack’ with which we are brought up. Parents would say, study hard son, or you will fail in life; work hard son, or you will not come up in life etc. By the time we are grown up and ready to face the world, we only see challenges to be overcome if we are to succeed. Challenges never seem to go away. If we overcome one, by say getting a good job, then there is the challenge of rising in our profession. And then there is the question of status, prestige, competition, our children’s future etc. etc. All these cause unceasing restlessness in us and a conviction that life is all about solving problems.

The truth is, as I have understood it, you can’t solve problems for the simple reason that there are no problems! We see problems because we have been taught to see wrongly. We have to learn to see within ourselves. What does it mean to ‘see within’? We will have to become a witness to the goings-on in our mind. Whatever our five senses conveys to us, it is the understanding of it generated by the mind that is relevant to us. We have to watch our mind. One technique that would be useful would be to talk to ourselves silently, thereby making language our inner eye. We take language for granted because we have grown up with it. Language is a bridge gifted to us by consciousness to lead us to higher consciousness.

I shall write more if you think I am not talking gibberish. Nothing conclusive from me - just an exploration, a joint-exploration with all who would participate, into the possibility of making our minds restful and thereby seeing everything (including our politicians!) in a new light and in a more truthful light.

10:01:56 PM
Posted By Venu Gopal Comments (0) Uncategorized